You may or may not have heard about this but it's a story of someone getting what they deserve. Former UFC fighter Roger Huerta (155 lbs) beat the shit out of former Texas Longhorn Linebacker, Rashad Bobino (230 lbs).
The reason Huerta whipped his ass was because Bobino sucker-punched a girl in the face and knocked her out. You read that correctly, he SUCKER-punched a GIRL and then got his ASS KICKED! Huerta came to her defense and Bobino told Huerta that he was going to knock his ass out too. Things didn't turn out the way Bobino hoped.
The first link below is an article where Huerta was interviewed about the incident. The second link is video that someone took of the whole thing.
http://thebiglead.com/index.php/2010/08/08/roger-huerta-knocked-out-an-ex-longhorn-lb/
http://www.tmz.com/videos?autoplay=true&mediaKey=06122435-fea9-4358-91eb-330a87db4f24
Friday, September 10, 2010
Thursday, August 19, 2010
Why Doesn't TCU Sell Out Football Games?
The city of Fort Worth is one of the nicer places in the US. It’s fast growing with plenty of business opportunity for professionals. There are roughly 6.2 million people that live in DFW. Fort Worth alone has a population of 730,000 (Tarrant County ~ 2 million). The city often gets overlooked by its larger neighbor Dallas but is just as nice if not nicer. The people of Fort Worth (and Tarrant County) seem to be very proud of their city and support most things in and around it. Needless to say Fort Worth has a lot going for it and is an excellent place to call home.
So the question here is why doesn’t the city of Fort Worth (and greater DFW) support TCU football more than it currently does? When you compare Fort Worth to Austin the two cities have roughly the same population. However, when you look at the greater metro areas there is no comparison. DFW is over four times larger than greater Austin. One would think that with such a huge population in TCU’s back yard attendance at home football games would average at least 50,000 (instead of its current average of 38,000) considering the success of the program over the last decade. The University of Texas averages over 95,000 fans each home game and they do so in a metro area that doesn’t compare to DFW. Below I will briefly touch on some of the reasons that TCU doesn’t have higher attendance numbers.
TCU doesn’t have the long football tradition that UT, OU and others have
TCU has a tradition of winning but when you compare it to that of UT or OU it doesn’t match up well. However, if TCU continues on their current path (and it looks like they will) they will slowly gain more recognition for a strong football tradition.
Unlike Austin, Norman (etc.), in DFW there are many other options when it comes to sports
This is the one of the few down sides to being in the 4th largest metro area in the United States. Competing with the Dallas Cowboys will always be a losing battle in DFW. In addition to the Cowboys you have the Rangers, Mavericks, Stars, Vigilantes, FC Dallas and many minor league hockey and baseball teams. The good news is the more TCU wins the better they can compete for attention.
TCU is a private university with a smaller alumni base than large public universities
This is one they can’t really help. It stands to reason that UT averages 95,000+ fans a game partly because it’s the largest university in the nation. TCU has roughly 9,000 students compared to UT’s 55,000. However, I would also like to point out that Notre Dame averages over 80,000 and they too are a private university of the same size. In addition Notre Dame isn’t in the middle of a metro area with 6.2 million people.
TCU is in the Mountain West and not a major BCS conference
The Mountain West is the best of the non BSC conferences. As a matter fact it is likely stronger in football than the Big East. Unfortunately UTAH is leaving the conference and BYU is threatening to go independent. Granted Boise State is set to join but will they follow through if BYU leaves. TCU might want to start looking for a new conference. Maybe they will finally get the Big 12 invite they should have received over Baylor to begin with.
TCU has not done a very good job of getting its merchandise sold in a variety of retail outlets
When you go to the store you will likely see UT, OU, Texas Tech and A&M merchandise filling the shelves. Unless you are close to the TCU campus it’s not always easy to find TCU merchandise. The schools that have made their merchandise available to the masses not only benefit financially but also get young fans hooked early. As any parent can tell you if your kids want to go see a certain team play you likely will find yourself at one of their games in the near future. If TCU can get more distribution for its merchandise it can get more young fans interested and some of them may turn into lifelong fans.
TCU may be the best college football program in DFW but they aren’t the only one -- UNT & SMU also compete for fans in the area
While SMU and UNT can’t compete with TCU on the field they do compete for attention. UNT is a large public school with a large student body (36,000) and an alumni base that primarily stays in DFW. SMU may not be as dominant as they were in the 80s but they are much improved under current coach June Jones. The more SMU improves the more attention they will get and they are on the Dallas side of DFW where more than half of the 6.2 million live. TCU needs to more aggressively market its football team which brings me to my last point.
TCU needs to do a better job of marketing the football program to the community
While large public universities may be able to rely solely on their alumni base to fill the stadium small private schools don’t have that luxury. TCU needs to take advantage of the population base outside its door. If TCU was in a town of 100,000 people it wouldn’t have to do much marketing to get noticed. However as I mentioned in an earlier point there are many other sports options for people in DFW. A more aggressive marketing campaign could generate the interest needed to fill Amon G. Carter Stadium.
So the question here is why doesn’t the city of Fort Worth (and greater DFW) support TCU football more than it currently does? When you compare Fort Worth to Austin the two cities have roughly the same population. However, when you look at the greater metro areas there is no comparison. DFW is over four times larger than greater Austin. One would think that with such a huge population in TCU’s back yard attendance at home football games would average at least 50,000 (instead of its current average of 38,000) considering the success of the program over the last decade. The University of Texas averages over 95,000 fans each home game and they do so in a metro area that doesn’t compare to DFW. Below I will briefly touch on some of the reasons that TCU doesn’t have higher attendance numbers.
TCU doesn’t have the long football tradition that UT, OU and others have
TCU has a tradition of winning but when you compare it to that of UT or OU it doesn’t match up well. However, if TCU continues on their current path (and it looks like they will) they will slowly gain more recognition for a strong football tradition.
Unlike Austin, Norman (etc.), in DFW there are many other options when it comes to sports
This is the one of the few down sides to being in the 4th largest metro area in the United States. Competing with the Dallas Cowboys will always be a losing battle in DFW. In addition to the Cowboys you have the Rangers, Mavericks, Stars, Vigilantes, FC Dallas and many minor league hockey and baseball teams. The good news is the more TCU wins the better they can compete for attention.
TCU is a private university with a smaller alumni base than large public universities
This is one they can’t really help. It stands to reason that UT averages 95,000+ fans a game partly because it’s the largest university in the nation. TCU has roughly 9,000 students compared to UT’s 55,000. However, I would also like to point out that Notre Dame averages over 80,000 and they too are a private university of the same size. In addition Notre Dame isn’t in the middle of a metro area with 6.2 million people.
TCU is in the Mountain West and not a major BCS conference
The Mountain West is the best of the non BSC conferences. As a matter fact it is likely stronger in football than the Big East. Unfortunately UTAH is leaving the conference and BYU is threatening to go independent. Granted Boise State is set to join but will they follow through if BYU leaves. TCU might want to start looking for a new conference. Maybe they will finally get the Big 12 invite they should have received over Baylor to begin with.
TCU has not done a very good job of getting its merchandise sold in a variety of retail outlets
When you go to the store you will likely see UT, OU, Texas Tech and A&M merchandise filling the shelves. Unless you are close to the TCU campus it’s not always easy to find TCU merchandise. The schools that have made their merchandise available to the masses not only benefit financially but also get young fans hooked early. As any parent can tell you if your kids want to go see a certain team play you likely will find yourself at one of their games in the near future. If TCU can get more distribution for its merchandise it can get more young fans interested and some of them may turn into lifelong fans.
TCU may be the best college football program in DFW but they aren’t the only one -- UNT & SMU also compete for fans in the area
While SMU and UNT can’t compete with TCU on the field they do compete for attention. UNT is a large public school with a large student body (36,000) and an alumni base that primarily stays in DFW. SMU may not be as dominant as they were in the 80s but they are much improved under current coach June Jones. The more SMU improves the more attention they will get and they are on the Dallas side of DFW where more than half of the 6.2 million live. TCU needs to more aggressively market its football team which brings me to my last point.
TCU needs to do a better job of marketing the football program to the community
While large public universities may be able to rely solely on their alumni base to fill the stadium small private schools don’t have that luxury. TCU needs to take advantage of the population base outside its door. If TCU was in a town of 100,000 people it wouldn’t have to do much marketing to get noticed. However as I mentioned in an earlier point there are many other sports options for people in DFW. A more aggressive marketing campaign could generate the interest needed to fill Amon G. Carter Stadium.
Tuesday, August 17, 2010
Horned Frogs to do Renovation of Stadium
TCU announces renovation of Amon G. Carter Stadium
Renovation will transform stadium into “Camden Yards” of collegiate stadiums
Aug. 16, 2010 (FORT WORTH, Texas) – TCU today announced a $105 million renovation of the west side and north end zone of Amon G. Carter Stadium to better enhance football fans’ experience, upgrade amenities and transform the historic Fort Worth icon into the “Camden Yards” of collegiate football stadiums.
Work on the renovation, which is funded by donor support, will begin immediately following this year’s football season and be fully completed in 2012.
“We must continually provide students the best possible university experience,” said TCU Chancellor Victor J. Boschini, Jr. “This includes building facilities to support a vibrant living experience and an outstanding learning environment. I am pleased that over the past five years we have successfully raised funds to improve academics, athletics and student living.
This stadium renovation, which would not have been possible without the generous support of our donors for which we are very grateful, will propel us to yet another level of excellence that will positively impact our university as well as the city of Fort Worth.
We also are extremely grateful to the Amon G. Carter Foundation for their initial gift of $15 million that made this entire project possible, one that will result in a significantly improved game day experience for all fans.”
Construction will begin immediately following TCU's final home game in the 2010 season. After construction, Amon G. Carter Stadium will have a seating capacity of 40,000 that can be expanded to more than 50,000 seats.
"We are very grateful to our donors for making this possible. Having a first-class stadium with all the modern amenities is key in enhancing the student-athlete experience and providing our community with a fabulous venue to enjoy football games,” said TCU Director of Intercollegiate Athletics Chris Del Conte.
“I also would like to thank Chancellor Boschini and our Board of Trustees who are truly the wind beneath our wings on this project. They were behind us every step of the way. Special thanks also goes to Associate Athletics Director Davis Babb and Head Football Coach Gary Patterson for their unbelievable fundraising efforts. They are true leaders and team players.
We are incredibly appreciative of the tremendous support we received on this historic project from TCU and Fort Worth."
TCU began examining the possibility of renovating its stadium in 2006 when Luther King, chairman of TCU’s Board of Trustees (BOT), appointed Clarence Scharbauer, vice chair of the BOT, to lead a stadium renovation committee. The committee’s invaluable work, along with that of TCU administrators, led to a stadium renovation that will lift the historical icon to a level of national visibility on par with the University’s championship-winning football team.
"Having a new stadium will have a great impact on our recruiting efforts,” Patterson said. “It helps us take the next step in what we're trying to accomplish as a program, and that's winning a national championship. We want to thank all of our friends for making this stadium possible."
Built in 1930, this is the first major renovation to the stadium since the upper deck was added in 1956. Designed by HKS Sports & Entertainment Group, who most recently completed work on the Cowboys Stadium in Arlington, the renovation greatly enhances the fan experience by improving stadium accessibility, seating and views of the playing field. The renovation consists of:
Through research, we discovered that Amon G. Carter Stadium’s original design intent incorporated this architectural style. However, it was not fully realized. The new design blends seamlessly with the Meyer–Martin Athletic Complex, the TCU campus and the city of Fort Worth.”
Suites and lounges also will reflect the Southwestern art deco as well as the graphics and way-finding signage throughout the stadium. By integrating the University colors, HKS has created a unique look and feel for the renovated Amon G. Carter Stadium. In addition, the north concourse will mirror the south concourse and fans will be able to see the field while walking through either concourse.
“Unlike the majority of major college football facilities in the country, which tuck fan amenities under the seating bowl, the new Amon G. Carter Stadium brings the action on the field into the main concourse – allowing fans to always be connected to the game,” said Phillips.
http://www.stadium.tcu.edu/release.asp
Renovation will transform stadium into “Camden Yards” of collegiate stadiums
Aug. 16, 2010 (FORT WORTH, Texas) – TCU today announced a $105 million renovation of the west side and north end zone of Amon G. Carter Stadium to better enhance football fans’ experience, upgrade amenities and transform the historic Fort Worth icon into the “Camden Yards” of collegiate football stadiums.
Work on the renovation, which is funded by donor support, will begin immediately following this year’s football season and be fully completed in 2012.
“We must continually provide students the best possible university experience,” said TCU Chancellor Victor J. Boschini, Jr. “This includes building facilities to support a vibrant living experience and an outstanding learning environment. I am pleased that over the past five years we have successfully raised funds to improve academics, athletics and student living.
This stadium renovation, which would not have been possible without the generous support of our donors for which we are very grateful, will propel us to yet another level of excellence that will positively impact our university as well as the city of Fort Worth.
We also are extremely grateful to the Amon G. Carter Foundation for their initial gift of $15 million that made this entire project possible, one that will result in a significantly improved game day experience for all fans.”
Construction will begin immediately following TCU's final home game in the 2010 season. After construction, Amon G. Carter Stadium will have a seating capacity of 40,000 that can be expanded to more than 50,000 seats.
"We are very grateful to our donors for making this possible. Having a first-class stadium with all the modern amenities is key in enhancing the student-athlete experience and providing our community with a fabulous venue to enjoy football games,” said TCU Director of Intercollegiate Athletics Chris Del Conte.
“I also would like to thank Chancellor Boschini and our Board of Trustees who are truly the wind beneath our wings on this project. They were behind us every step of the way. Special thanks also goes to Associate Athletics Director Davis Babb and Head Football Coach Gary Patterson for their unbelievable fundraising efforts. They are true leaders and team players.
We are incredibly appreciative of the tremendous support we received on this historic project from TCU and Fort Worth."
TCU began examining the possibility of renovating its stadium in 2006 when Luther King, chairman of TCU’s Board of Trustees (BOT), appointed Clarence Scharbauer, vice chair of the BOT, to lead a stadium renovation committee. The committee’s invaluable work, along with that of TCU administrators, led to a stadium renovation that will lift the historical icon to a level of national visibility on par with the University’s championship-winning football team.
"Having a new stadium will have a great impact on our recruiting efforts,” Patterson said. “It helps us take the next step in what we're trying to accomplish as a program, and that's winning a national championship. We want to thank all of our friends for making this stadium possible."
Built in 1930, this is the first major renovation to the stadium since the upper deck was added in 1956. Designed by HKS Sports & Entertainment Group, who most recently completed work on the Cowboys Stadium in Arlington, the renovation greatly enhances the fan experience by improving stadium accessibility, seating and views of the playing field. The renovation consists of:
- Significantly upgraded and new concession stands for better access and reduced wait times
- Elevators and escalators to better facilitate stadium accessibility and crowd flow
- A new, raised seating bowl on the west and north end for enhanced field views
- Upgraded and additional men’s and women’s restrooms
- Suites, club seating and lounges on the west side of the stadium
- A new press box
Through research, we discovered that Amon G. Carter Stadium’s original design intent incorporated this architectural style. However, it was not fully realized. The new design blends seamlessly with the Meyer–Martin Athletic Complex, the TCU campus and the city of Fort Worth.”
Suites and lounges also will reflect the Southwestern art deco as well as the graphics and way-finding signage throughout the stadium. By integrating the University colors, HKS has created a unique look and feel for the renovated Amon G. Carter Stadium. In addition, the north concourse will mirror the south concourse and fans will be able to see the field while walking through either concourse.
“Unlike the majority of major college football facilities in the country, which tuck fan amenities under the seating bowl, the new Amon G. Carter Stadium brings the action on the field into the main concourse – allowing fans to always be connected to the game,” said Phillips.
http://www.stadium.tcu.edu/release.asp
Monday, August 16, 2010
TCU: Leveling the Field
August 2010
Leveling the Field
How coach Gary Patterson turned TCU Into a football powerhouse.
by Kasey S. Pipes
September 17, 2004, marked one of the most important days in the life of Texas Christian University head coach Gary Patterson. On that dusty, windswept afternoon on the Lubbock plains, he experienced the most humiliating defeat of his career. The Horned Frogs had entered the 2004 season filled with promise and purpose. The year before, only a late season loss at Southern Mississippi had kept them from a likely BCS bowl game. As 2004 began, the Frogs were once again heading down the road to their BCS destination.
But they smashed into a dead-end in Lubbock. After TCU opened the game with a 21-0 lead, Texas Tech stormed back and embarrassed the Horned Frogs 70-35. Patterson’s defense convulsed and collapsed under the surge of Mike Leach’s spread offense. The game marked the first time in fifty years a Red Raider team had scored seventy points.
After the game, the coach sat alone on the bus as it meandered through the Lubbock streets toward the airport. “It was a like a funeral on that bus,” recalled a staff member. Shocked and saddened, the players said nothing. But the silence was soon pierced by the sound of the coach opening his bag, logging onto his computer, and watching film for next week.
***
Six years later, Patterson is sitting in an overstuffed leather chair in the John Justin Athletic Center at TCU. His office is adorned with gridiron décor—signed photos of fellow coaches adorn the walls while coaching awards and bowl game trophies are perched on a table. Curiously, he gets most animated when pointing to a photo book on African wildlife. “This year was my first safari,” he says. “I want to go back. I love adventure. I love new things.”
The coach is dressed simply: a white golf shirt, khaki shorts, and brown Cole Haan shoes with no socks. He looks more prepared for the golf course than the football field. But looks deceive. In conversation, an intensity creases his face. He nervously takes his glasses on and off. And his raspy voice squeaks more than talks.
Patterson doesn’t seem like a man who has lived half a century. His face is bordered on top by youthful blond hair and accented by blue eyes. He shows every indication of still being the fiery, stocky, 5’10” player who walked on at Kansas State. At any moment, he seems ready to burst across his desk and make a tackle.
“I’ve always had to work harder and smarter,” he says. Growing up in Rozell, Kansas, Patterson spent his summers helping his dad grapple with uncooperative farmland. Starting before dawn, he would flatten soil and level bumps. He made smooth the rugged earth so that crops could bloom and be harvested. In some ways, he continues to level the field today, turning adversity into advantage.
“That game in Lubbock changed everything,” Patterson says, remembering his humiliation from six years ago. “That game told me that people had caught up with me. I had to change.”
Patterson first arrived at TCU in 1998 as the defensive coordinator on coach Dennis Franchione’s staff. After leading TCU to three bowl games in as many years, Fran left for greener gridirons at Alabama. His defensive coordinator was promoted to head coach at TCU. No one knew it at the time but the Crimson Tide had hired the wrong man.
For years, Franchione’s programs had been known for recruiting and defense. Unfortunately for Alabama, those were two areas where Fran had leaned on Patterson. Without his best assistant on staff, Fran floundered at Alabama and was later fired at Texas A&M.
As a head coach, Patterson is nothing if not a paradox—an old school coach who is looking constantly for new ideas and innovative strategies, a hard-nosed disciplinarian who still finds time to invite players to his home once a week for pizza.
This fusion of fire and ice is displayed every day at practice. Dressed in a sweat-stained black shirt and shorts, with a tweed safari hat sitting uneasily on his head, he relentlessly drives his players. Yelling. Clapping. Gesturing. Always moving.
“I would love to see you finish a practice as hard as you start one!” he needles freshman safety Antonio Graves. But in the next instant, he is calmly teaching the same player how to keep his feet moving and backpedal. He scolds, but he molds too.
More than anything else, Patterson’s success at TCU has been defined by his ability to recruit talent and coach defense.
As a recruiter, he employs a unique method to mine for players in Texas, a state that represents perhaps the richest quarry of high school talent in the country. To compete against recruiting gurus like Mack Brown and Bob Stoops, he has developed a penchant for taking fast offensive players and transforming them into fast but muscular defensive players. Jerry Hughes serves as the most prominent example. A quick running back at Fort Bend High School, he muscled up and developed into an All-America defensive lineman at TCU and the Indianapolis Colts’ first round draft pick.
“It’s not rocket science what we’ve done on recruiting,” Patterson says. “In Texas, high school coaches play their best athletes at two positions: quarterback and running back. So we look there first. If we see some talent, we look for ways to get the kid on the field, and that often means defense.”
College football experts have taken notice. “You can’t say enough about the job Gary’s done at TCU,” says CBS Sports college football analyst Archie Manning. “To have to recruit against Texas and OU and yet your school isn’t even in a BCS conference? That’s a huge disadvantage. Yet great players still come to TCU.”
And once they come, they begin to learn about Patterson’s zealous devotion to defense. Like an evangelical pastor, the coach can quote chapter and verse of his defensive gospel. He runs a unique defensive scheme called the 4-2-5, which only a handful of other college teams run. The novelty of his system allows TCU to confuse other teams and achieve more with less. It helps the Frogs compete with bigger, more talented offenses.
“The basic idea of the 4-2-5 defense is speed,” he preaches. “We want to keep the ball inside of and in front of our defenders at all times.” To do this, Patterson deploys three safeties and often leaves the two cornerbacks in man-to-man coverage. By moving around the safeties, he can disguise when and where he will bring pressure. And he also can create an eight-man front, making it difficult for the opposing team to run the ball—always a defense’s primary goal.
But in 2004 in Lubbock, Patterson realized that stopping the run wouldn’t work if the other team was spreading out his secondary and torching it. And so he did what he so often does—he returned to the lab and began experimenting. In time, he found new ways to cover more receivers in open space.
“That next year, the defensive scheme looked the same but operated differently,” says TCU radio announcer and former player John Denton. “Once the ball was snapped, Gary found ways to drop more players into coverage. I remember defensive linemen dropping into coverage and intercepting passes. It was wild. But it worked.”
By 2009, his experimentation had paid off and the 4-2-5 defense was stopping both the run and the pass. That year, TCU ranked first in the nation in total defense, third in run defense, and sixth in pass defense.
Even now, Patterson continues to tweak his defense. “He is always experimenting,” says his wife, Kelsey. “He’ll come home at 9:30 at night and then go into our office. He lies down on the floor, opens up the laptop and starts watching film while our two Golden Retrievers lay next to him. He’ll stay in there for hours. He never stops working.”
Many nights Kelsey has been awakened by the sound of a raspy shrill.
“I’ve got it!” her husband yells as he bursts into their bedroom. “I figured out how to cover their slot receiver when he’s in motion!”
“That’s great, Gary,” she responds. “Can we talk about it in the morning?”
***
On September 17, 2006, Texas Tech played TCU in Fort Worth. The memories of the 70-35 thrashing from two years before were fresh on the minds of the Frog players. Many even watched the video of that nightmare as motivation. They didn’t need it. The revised 4-2-5 defense shut down the vaunted Mike Leach offense and held Tech to 242 yards total offense—one of the worst offensive performances of Leach’s tenure at Tech.
Since avenging Tech, Patterson has taken TCU to the precipice of a national championship and come to embody his program—the overachieving coach of the overlooked school, the little guy going up against the big boys.
As the 2010 season begins, the Horned Frogs are ranked in the preseason Top Ten. Can they win a national title? In large part, it depends on the coach, who will be up every night, typing on his laptop, looking for a new way to tweak his defense and level the field.
Kasey S. Pipes wrote speeches for President George W. Bush and authored Ike’s Final Battle: The Road to Little Rock and the Challenge of Equality. A native Texan, he lives in Fort Worth.
Copyright © 1973-2010 Emmis Publishing LP dba Texas Monthly. All rights reserved.
http://www.texasmonthly.com/2010-08-01/webextra10.php#
Leveling the Field
How coach Gary Patterson turned TCU Into a football powerhouse.
by Kasey S. Pipes
September 17, 2004, marked one of the most important days in the life of Texas Christian University head coach Gary Patterson. On that dusty, windswept afternoon on the Lubbock plains, he experienced the most humiliating defeat of his career. The Horned Frogs had entered the 2004 season filled with promise and purpose. The year before, only a late season loss at Southern Mississippi had kept them from a likely BCS bowl game. As 2004 began, the Frogs were once again heading down the road to their BCS destination.
But they smashed into a dead-end in Lubbock. After TCU opened the game with a 21-0 lead, Texas Tech stormed back and embarrassed the Horned Frogs 70-35. Patterson’s defense convulsed and collapsed under the surge of Mike Leach’s spread offense. The game marked the first time in fifty years a Red Raider team had scored seventy points.
After the game, the coach sat alone on the bus as it meandered through the Lubbock streets toward the airport. “It was a like a funeral on that bus,” recalled a staff member. Shocked and saddened, the players said nothing. But the silence was soon pierced by the sound of the coach opening his bag, logging onto his computer, and watching film for next week.
***
Six years later, Patterson is sitting in an overstuffed leather chair in the John Justin Athletic Center at TCU. His office is adorned with gridiron décor—signed photos of fellow coaches adorn the walls while coaching awards and bowl game trophies are perched on a table. Curiously, he gets most animated when pointing to a photo book on African wildlife. “This year was my first safari,” he says. “I want to go back. I love adventure. I love new things.”
The coach is dressed simply: a white golf shirt, khaki shorts, and brown Cole Haan shoes with no socks. He looks more prepared for the golf course than the football field. But looks deceive. In conversation, an intensity creases his face. He nervously takes his glasses on and off. And his raspy voice squeaks more than talks.
Patterson doesn’t seem like a man who has lived half a century. His face is bordered on top by youthful blond hair and accented by blue eyes. He shows every indication of still being the fiery, stocky, 5’10” player who walked on at Kansas State. At any moment, he seems ready to burst across his desk and make a tackle.
“I’ve always had to work harder and smarter,” he says. Growing up in Rozell, Kansas, Patterson spent his summers helping his dad grapple with uncooperative farmland. Starting before dawn, he would flatten soil and level bumps. He made smooth the rugged earth so that crops could bloom and be harvested. In some ways, he continues to level the field today, turning adversity into advantage.
“That game in Lubbock changed everything,” Patterson says, remembering his humiliation from six years ago. “That game told me that people had caught up with me. I had to change.”
Patterson first arrived at TCU in 1998 as the defensive coordinator on coach Dennis Franchione’s staff. After leading TCU to three bowl games in as many years, Fran left for greener gridirons at Alabama. His defensive coordinator was promoted to head coach at TCU. No one knew it at the time but the Crimson Tide had hired the wrong man.
For years, Franchione’s programs had been known for recruiting and defense. Unfortunately for Alabama, those were two areas where Fran had leaned on Patterson. Without his best assistant on staff, Fran floundered at Alabama and was later fired at Texas A&M.
As a head coach, Patterson is nothing if not a paradox—an old school coach who is looking constantly for new ideas and innovative strategies, a hard-nosed disciplinarian who still finds time to invite players to his home once a week for pizza.
This fusion of fire and ice is displayed every day at practice. Dressed in a sweat-stained black shirt and shorts, with a tweed safari hat sitting uneasily on his head, he relentlessly drives his players. Yelling. Clapping. Gesturing. Always moving.
“I would love to see you finish a practice as hard as you start one!” he needles freshman safety Antonio Graves. But in the next instant, he is calmly teaching the same player how to keep his feet moving and backpedal. He scolds, but he molds too.
More than anything else, Patterson’s success at TCU has been defined by his ability to recruit talent and coach defense.
As a recruiter, he employs a unique method to mine for players in Texas, a state that represents perhaps the richest quarry of high school talent in the country. To compete against recruiting gurus like Mack Brown and Bob Stoops, he has developed a penchant for taking fast offensive players and transforming them into fast but muscular defensive players. Jerry Hughes serves as the most prominent example. A quick running back at Fort Bend High School, he muscled up and developed into an All-America defensive lineman at TCU and the Indianapolis Colts’ first round draft pick.
“It’s not rocket science what we’ve done on recruiting,” Patterson says. “In Texas, high school coaches play their best athletes at two positions: quarterback and running back. So we look there first. If we see some talent, we look for ways to get the kid on the field, and that often means defense.”
College football experts have taken notice. “You can’t say enough about the job Gary’s done at TCU,” says CBS Sports college football analyst Archie Manning. “To have to recruit against Texas and OU and yet your school isn’t even in a BCS conference? That’s a huge disadvantage. Yet great players still come to TCU.”
And once they come, they begin to learn about Patterson’s zealous devotion to defense. Like an evangelical pastor, the coach can quote chapter and verse of his defensive gospel. He runs a unique defensive scheme called the 4-2-5, which only a handful of other college teams run. The novelty of his system allows TCU to confuse other teams and achieve more with less. It helps the Frogs compete with bigger, more talented offenses.
“The basic idea of the 4-2-5 defense is speed,” he preaches. “We want to keep the ball inside of and in front of our defenders at all times.” To do this, Patterson deploys three safeties and often leaves the two cornerbacks in man-to-man coverage. By moving around the safeties, he can disguise when and where he will bring pressure. And he also can create an eight-man front, making it difficult for the opposing team to run the ball—always a defense’s primary goal.
But in 2004 in Lubbock, Patterson realized that stopping the run wouldn’t work if the other team was spreading out his secondary and torching it. And so he did what he so often does—he returned to the lab and began experimenting. In time, he found new ways to cover more receivers in open space.
“That next year, the defensive scheme looked the same but operated differently,” says TCU radio announcer and former player John Denton. “Once the ball was snapped, Gary found ways to drop more players into coverage. I remember defensive linemen dropping into coverage and intercepting passes. It was wild. But it worked.”
By 2009, his experimentation had paid off and the 4-2-5 defense was stopping both the run and the pass. That year, TCU ranked first in the nation in total defense, third in run defense, and sixth in pass defense.
Even now, Patterson continues to tweak his defense. “He is always experimenting,” says his wife, Kelsey. “He’ll come home at 9:30 at night and then go into our office. He lies down on the floor, opens up the laptop and starts watching film while our two Golden Retrievers lay next to him. He’ll stay in there for hours. He never stops working.”
Many nights Kelsey has been awakened by the sound of a raspy shrill.
“I’ve got it!” her husband yells as he bursts into their bedroom. “I figured out how to cover their slot receiver when he’s in motion!”
“That’s great, Gary,” she responds. “Can we talk about it in the morning?”
***
On September 17, 2006, Texas Tech played TCU in Fort Worth. The memories of the 70-35 thrashing from two years before were fresh on the minds of the Frog players. Many even watched the video of that nightmare as motivation. They didn’t need it. The revised 4-2-5 defense shut down the vaunted Mike Leach offense and held Tech to 242 yards total offense—one of the worst offensive performances of Leach’s tenure at Tech.
Since avenging Tech, Patterson has taken TCU to the precipice of a national championship and come to embody his program—the overachieving coach of the overlooked school, the little guy going up against the big boys.
As the 2010 season begins, the Horned Frogs are ranked in the preseason Top Ten. Can they win a national title? In large part, it depends on the coach, who will be up every night, typing on his laptop, looking for a new way to tweak his defense and level the field.
Kasey S. Pipes wrote speeches for President George W. Bush and authored Ike’s Final Battle: The Road to Little Rock and the Challenge of Equality. A native Texan, he lives in Fort Worth.
Copyright © 1973-2010 Emmis Publishing LP dba Texas Monthly. All rights reserved.
http://www.texasmonthly.com/2010-08-01/webextra10.php#
Saturday, April 10, 2010
Ranking Texas Football Programs
The state of Texas has 10 FBS schools. Even with all the high school talent in the state not all universities can be competitive year in and year out. Unfortunately most of the schools are rarely, if ever, competitive.
With that said I have decided to rank each school according to its prestige and success on the football field. This is the type of list that recruits should find interesting.
1) Texas Longhorns
When a school is willing to allocate so much money to athletics that the school has the largest athletic budget in the nation what else would you expect. Texas does a nice job at attracting top talent. Unfortunately Texas also does an EXCELLENT job at turning their football team in to felons. BOOK 'EM Horns!
2) Texas Tech Red Raiders
Not nearly the budget of UT but they get more bang for their buck than just about any school in the country. Coach Tommy Tuberville is one of the best coaches in the nation and Tech is a program that is on the rise. The Red Raiders have the brightest future of any university in the state. Tubs is going into his first season as the Tech head coach but expect big things in the years to come. Tubs should get great recruits because he is the type of guy parents want their kids to play for. If a kid comes from a Christian family then Texas Tech is a perfect fit. Lubbock is a good conservative town with plenty of things for college kids to do. Lubbock is the second largest city in all of the BIG 12. On top of that Tuberville is a strong Christian that will be the best role model a young adult could ask for. Kids that play for Tubs will be prepared for success not only in football but life as well.
3) TCU Horn Frogs
A private school with strong academics that is still a football power. Baylor University wishes it had this type of football program. Heck Baylor wishes it had the strong academics of TCU but Baylor is far behind the Horn Frogs in both areas. Gary Patterson is an excellent coach and does a great job at identifying talent. TCU is much more deserving of being in the BIG 12 than lowly Baylor....unfortunately the BIG 12 is stuck with the Gaylor Bears. TCU offers a great college football experience and an excellent education. There truly is no down side to this school.
4) Houston Cougars
5) Texas A&M Aggies
If you have dreams of never living up to your potential and being an overall failure then Aggieland is the place for you! This program has been on the decline for some time and shows no real signs of returning to its former glory. The school is full of social misfits and they brain wash every student that steps on campus. A&M has a large budget for football but that doesn't seem to help. There is something in the aggies DNA that has doomed them to failure and being the butt of all jokes. If you DON'T consider yourself a loser, steer clear of this crap hole.
6) SMU Mustangs
7) Rice Owls
8) UTEP Miners
9) North Texas Mean Green Eagles
10) Baylor Bears
With that said I have decided to rank each school according to its prestige and success on the football field. This is the type of list that recruits should find interesting.
1) Texas Longhorns
When a school is willing to allocate so much money to athletics that the school has the largest athletic budget in the nation what else would you expect. Texas does a nice job at attracting top talent. Unfortunately Texas also does an EXCELLENT job at turning their football team in to felons. BOOK 'EM Horns!
2) Texas Tech Red Raiders
Not nearly the budget of UT but they get more bang for their buck than just about any school in the country. Coach Tommy Tuberville is one of the best coaches in the nation and Tech is a program that is on the rise. The Red Raiders have the brightest future of any university in the state. Tubs is going into his first season as the Tech head coach but expect big things in the years to come. Tubs should get great recruits because he is the type of guy parents want their kids to play for. If a kid comes from a Christian family then Texas Tech is a perfect fit. Lubbock is a good conservative town with plenty of things for college kids to do. Lubbock is the second largest city in all of the BIG 12. On top of that Tuberville is a strong Christian that will be the best role model a young adult could ask for. Kids that play for Tubs will be prepared for success not only in football but life as well.
3) TCU Horn Frogs
A private school with strong academics that is still a football power. Baylor University wishes it had this type of football program. Heck Baylor wishes it had the strong academics of TCU but Baylor is far behind the Horn Frogs in both areas. Gary Patterson is an excellent coach and does a great job at identifying talent. TCU is much more deserving of being in the BIG 12 than lowly Baylor....unfortunately the BIG 12 is stuck with the Gaylor Bears. TCU offers a great college football experience and an excellent education. There truly is no down side to this school.
4) Houston Cougars
5) Texas A&M Aggies
If you have dreams of never living up to your potential and being an overall failure then Aggieland is the place for you! This program has been on the decline for some time and shows no real signs of returning to its former glory. The school is full of social misfits and they brain wash every student that steps on campus. A&M has a large budget for football but that doesn't seem to help. There is something in the aggies DNA that has doomed them to failure and being the butt of all jokes. If you DON'T consider yourself a loser, steer clear of this crap hole.
6) SMU Mustangs
7) Rice Owls
8) UTEP Miners
9) North Texas Mean Green Eagles
10) Baylor Bears
Saturday, April 3, 2010
Mean Green Potential
The University of North Texas is sort of a hidden gem in a lot of respects. For starters the city of Denton is one of the coolest places you will ever find to hang out. The music scene in Denton is at least equal to that in Austin. If you don't believe me click here and see for yourself. If that tweaks your interest then check out Denton Live on a regular basis to see what is going on around town.
In addition the University of North Texas has really made huge strides in the last decade. The academic reputation continues to increase and the amount of new building going up is impressive to say the least. The College of Business is getting a new building that cost roughly $60 to $70 million to construct. When it is completed it will be state of the art! With over 36,000 students UNT is one of the largest universities in the state and warrants such top notch buildings.
On top of all the academic buildings going up the athletic department is doing some construction of its own. The Mean Green already have nice facilities and are getting a new Athletic Center that any university would love to have. 2010 will be the last year the football team plays at Fouts Field as a new stadium is under construction and will be ready for the 2011 season. The new stadium will be the focal point of a new area on campus called Mean Green Village.
Once Mean Green Village is complete UNT will be able to show recruits facilities that are just as nice as any other school in the country. If the Mean Green could get out of the Sun Belt and land in a conference such as The WAC, Conference USA or The Mountain West they could become a force to be reckoned with.
Things are changing at UNT and the direction the University is headed is exciting, both academically and athletically. I have a feeling that the way most think of UNT will be vastly different by the end of the next decade. In the mean time (pun intended) head up to Denton and at least check out that amazing music scene!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)